WASHINGTON -- Small and medium-sized airports worry they won’t have enough money to construct runways, buildings and terminals -- which could lead to longer passenger waits and flight delays -- if Congress slashes funding for a popular federal grant program as President Bush wants.
Congress approved $3.7 billion in grants for the Airport Improvement Program, run by the Federal Aviation Administration. The Bush administration proposes to cut funding by $950 million for the 2007 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1, saying $2.75 billion is enough to continue work on projects already under way, and stay focused on reducing congestion in airports and making air travel safer.
The airport industry and House Democrats are trying to reverse the cuts as Congress writes the federal budget, a process that typically lasts into late September.
Airport owners in Central Jersey are paying attention -- including Joe Horner, owner of Central Jersey Regional Airport in Hillsborough.
"As the years progress, we’ll be looking for additional federal funding for safety improvements, so ... yes it (the proposed cuts) will have an impact on us, as it will on other facilities across the country," Horner said.
Horner said his airport has received FAA Airport Improvement grants, the most recent for $2.2 million to make safety improvements to bring it to federal safety standards. Smaller airports have it worse as they are not always ranked as a priority to receive federal funding for improvements and private funding for the projects is extremely difficult to come by, Horner said.
"There’s a wish list of airport projects and there’s only a portion of that that’s picked up in any one year -- so in other words, unless you’re a Newark Airport, there’s no guarantee you’re going to get funding," Horner said. "It starts with the big boys first. The FAA -- that is it. They’re the big source. To obtain private funding is virtually impossible."
Thor Solberg, co-owner of Solberg-Hunterdon Airport in Readington, said funding cuts would not affect the airport.
"It’s not going to impact us because we have no plans to seek federal funds, however, I think it’s a sign of the times," Solberg said.
"There are competing interests for a very small pot of money -- aviation competes with social services and other programs that the government has to fund," Solberg said. "This is not an uncommon thing to see when resources are scarse."
Solberg has discussed potential safety improvements -- including repaving the airport’s main runway to its licensed length of 3,735 feet and moving it 300 feet to the west -- with the New Jersey Department of Transportation, which could contribute to the improvements.
Still, the industry as a whole is worried about possible cuts.
"I am not cynical enough to think that Congress will take care of this, and I can go play tennis now. We have to make the case," said Greg Principato, president of Airports Council International-North America. "Taking a billion dollars of what’s available for capital-improvement projects at a time when the system is adding passengers at a very fast clip just doesn’t make sense."
His group estimates the country’s airports require a total of $14 billion a year -- more than what the grant program provides -- to make air travel safer and smoother for passengers.
In May, 47 House Democrats said in a letter to their colleagues who set federal spending levels that slashing a program that’s provided airports large and small billions of dollars since 1982 is shortsighted. They said the Bush plan would change the formula the FAA uses to award yearly grants. Under the proposed revisions, the critics wrote, airports serving more than 10,000 passengers a year could see reductions of as much as 50 percent, and the country’s 2,500 tiniest airports could lose the $150,000 each now receives.
FAA Administrator Marion Blakey defended the cuts Tuesday, saying that many federal programs must be trimmed to pay for the Iraq war and rebuild the Gulf Coast after hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Besides, Blakey said, 95 percent of the country’s airfields are in fine shape, and airports can still receive federal funds through other grant programs. However, those programs don’t guarantee a minimum yearly payment.
"There are probably going to be some rehabilitation projects that will have to be deferred, but that is not going to affect either the safety or capacity of our system. I think we are, in fact, exceeding our goal," Blakey said.
Since 2001, the Bush administration has provided "very robust funding" through the grant program, she said. "Some of the smaller airports have had what would be characterized as quite extensive funding."
A total of 3,364 airports receive improvement grants. The money can be used for projects like building and maintaining runways, installing fences and airfield lights, buying weather-observation equipment, and building access roads.
Darryl Jenkins, an aviation consultant, said airports in hundreds of small and medium-sized towns in rural America would be disproportionately hit if the funds are cut because they rely more on the grants for capital projects compared with big airports like New York’s Kennedy International, Chicago’s O’Hare or Atlanta’s Hartsfield.
Smaller communities don’t have a large number of airlines operating out of their airports. That means they don’t get millions of dollars in fees, landing charges and rents airlines pay metropolitan hubs, Jenkins said.
Smaller airports also don’t have the assets to issue bonds and attract private investment like the big airports can.
McNary Field, in Salem, Ore., is one small airport counting on federal support for future expansion.
It has received $10 million since 1970, when Congress set up a forerunner to the Airport Improvement Program, for various projects such as building a taxiway and refurbishing the stormwater-drainage system. That’s enticed a number of private and corporate jet operations and the Oregon National Guard’s helicopter unit to move there.
Airport Manager Alan Alexander worries he won’t be able to lure commercial air service to McNary Field if federal funds dwindle. Under the Bush proposal, the airport risks losing the $150,000 it receives each year.
"We’d be devastated if we don’t have access to some federal capital-improvement funding," he said.
Not every airport director is critical of the Bush administration. Cynthia Schultz, director of Great Falls International Airport in Great Falls, Mont., said she can’t complain. The Bush administration has given the airport, which serves about 60,000 passengers a year, $35 million in the past three years to level a runway, which has a potentially dangerous dip in one end, Schultz said.
However, other smaller airports aren’t as fortunate, she said, adding she supports the Bush administration’s efforts to trim funding from a bloated program and to be more accountable to voters. The larger issue, she said, is redistributing the grants more equitably.
"You can spend the money a lot better. We build a lot of billion-dollar runways. And are you gaining a billion dollars worth of capacity? The answer is no," Schultz said. "Shouldn’t that billion dollars be spread to a lot of smaller and medium airports instead of the major hubs?"
Rural states such as West Virginia count on their airports for economic development as well, said Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va. By dangling a modern, efficient airport as a lure, states like his try to get businesses to relocate from congested cities, and create jobs in impoverished communities.
"These small companies we seek to attract are not going to go into an area where the service is going to be cut back," said Rahall, one of the Democrats who signed the letter and is a senior member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. "This nosedive cut in basic funding spells economic disaster."
An Arab American who has been critical of the war in Iraq, Rahall added, "If (the FAA) were to build airports in Iraq, I am sure they’ll get every penny they want."
Raju Chebium can be reached at rchebium@gns.gannett.com. Courier News staff writer Christa Segalini contributed to this story.
from the Courier News website www.c-n.com
Copyright © 1997-2006 Courier News.
Date: May 28, 2006 Source: C-N.com — Courier News Online
URL: http://www.c-n.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060528/NEWS/605280327
